Sunday, December 3, 2017

The noisy noiseless Remington Premier typewriter






10 comments:

  1. Beautiful typewriter. I use the @ so often I doubt I'd ever use the caret. Now a proper interrobang on a typewriter would be nice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least we can easily make an interrobang on a typewriter.

      Delete
  2. I'm surprised that you say the @ symbol was a minor and old-fashioned symbol in the 1930s. Surely you're saying this with an ironic wink, but it's misleading. Beautiful typewriter and nice explanation, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In that part of my remarks, I was sincerely speculating that Remington designers must have viewed the @ symbol that way. Do we have any hard evidence, though? I just checked Google's Ngram Viewer, which suggests that in English-language books, the @ symbol peaked around 1920, then dipped a bit in the 1930s, starting its rise only around 1980, with a weird anomaly peak in 1962. But this is not great evidence, since I imagine that @ primarily appeared in receipts and the like rather than books. Where else could we look?

      Delete
    2. I know @ only as a business symbol before the internet usage but, good grief, there sure was a lot of business conducted with typewriters in those days, '20s--'70s. war contracting, and so on. "5,000 widgets @ 12¢" or "can supply eggs @ 50¢/dz". Don't know about its use in academia or science.

      Ngram report is interesting. How was @ used in books, apart from business textbooks?

      Check mostly ephemera, I'm afraid: receipts, orders, estimates, quotes.

      If it was so on-the-way-out, why didn't other makers replace it and even Remington mostly kept it. And it's not like the caret is so very useful either.

      Why is such recent history so difficult? I don't mean in this case; I mean for society in general.

      Delete
  3. It was only this morning that I was dragging the old Remington Rand Model 1 down from the attic. I had a french letter to write - no, not that sort of french letter - a letter in French, with accents. It types beautifully and with that longed-for clack despite the rather brutal overhaul it had a few years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I can see the argument for caret, after all "at" is only one more character than @ so it's not like there wasn't a pretty easy workaround. I have a 1938 Remington Portable #5 Streamliner and it also has the caret in place of the @ sign.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ also replaced "each" and had a long history of doing it. How much is the caret actually used?

    Of 20 Remingtons I have here, two have the @ replaced by the ^ ('39 Rem-ette and '41 Quiet Model 1), one where both @ and ¢ have been replaced by ° and [division] ('60 Travel Riter), and one where--hee,hee--the ¢ is replaced with ^ giving us both @ and ^ on the same key ('36 Remington-Rand 5).

    All the rest have the @ and no caret at all, including one that has Paragraph and Section symbols in addition to the @. Admittedly a small sample, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have an Adler Universal that has both an @ character and an ea character!

      Replacing the ¢ would be a good idea, since that character is so easy to reproduce.

      One could go through the '30s Remington portables on typewriterdatabase.com and see which ones have a caret, although I don't have the time for that at the moment.

      Delete
    2. My old Model One also had a caret in place of the @.

      Delete